Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Managing Fund Balances under the 2% CAP

5 Budgeting Tips for Singles :: Mint.com/blog
Today's landscape of budgetary constrained growth requires comprehensive planning, review and regular oversight of all accounts and funds to ensure end of year balances are projected and met for future budgets and tax levy stability.  

The Summit School District, like many surrounding districts in the Tri-County area continues to provide a comprehensive educational program amidst the continuous budgetary constraints from the State of New Jersey with regard to State Aid and the 2% CAP structure.  The FY 2011 was marked by the elimination of State aid for “high wealth[1]” district’s such as Summit.  This resulted in a loss of revenue of ($2,587,433).   This action had a significant impact on development of the 2010-11 school budget requiring budgetary cuts and further reductions in order to meet the CAP now at 2%  on budgetary tax levy.  Although there was a return of State Aid in the fiscal year 2012 totaling $1,121,353 (after deductions of $57,272 for State facilities – Special Ed.), it represents only 43% of the original state aid received by the district in FY 2010.  The total adjusted aid for the 2014-15 budget received 2/25/14 was $1,607,073 or 46.7% of the FY2011 mark.  Regardless the district retained its competitive offering of programs through strategic initiatives designed to maximize operational efficiency and retain quality staff.


While the outcomes reveal a beneficial result, the underlying set of budgetary concepts underscore the need for a multi-disciplined approach in budgeting today that incorporates Zero Based Budgeting (ZBB) with Site Based Budgeting as part of the successful planning tools.
"Budget processes can be plotted on a continuum ranging from a centralized set of processes that rely little upon strategic planning and evaluation as the basis for budget development." - Guthrie, James W. Modern School Business Administration A Planning Approach Boston, New York: Pearson, 2008. 
In order to maintain effective budgets and balances today - we must live at the other end of the spectrum that requires continuous planning and evaluation to continue to meet the needs of the district and deliver a 21st Century Quality Based Education. Pepe, Louis. Budgeting Concepts, Graduate Program in Education. Montclair State University. Montclair, NJ. 12 November 2011. Lecture.
These are the basic concepts that I have taught and applied in a focused effort to maintain program and personnel while keeping an eye on the fiscal charge of the tax levy CAP of 2%.  The basic premise starts with real planning in the development of the budget (ZBB) in concert with the actual needs of the respective buildings (SBB).  Much like a household budget, if you don't need it... don't buy it!  If you need it ... then budget for it or wait until the appropriate time to purchase such as end of year, depending on cash flow availability.


Major purchases of equipment or projects (Fund 12) should be held until later in the school year (April - June) to ensure ample funds to meet unforeseen expenditures that arise within the budgetary year.  It's a little difficult to attempt to return a large purchase like a vehicle or furniture and impossible to undo spending on a small project when you need funds for a Special Ed. move in.


Validating encumbrances throughout the year needs to become a basic tenant of the budget cycle.  Another equally important measure is the concept of 'purchase over lease'.  While in many cases leasing provides an opportunity to make large purchases over time, it can become a deadly budgetary trap if continually added year over year with payments building until you have now created a huge annual payment that forces the district to pony up each year, not to mention interest.  This 'opportunity cost' takes money from other possible expenditures that are either required or sought.


This starts with a clear understanding and control over your personnel sections of the budget as they account for roughly 80% of the total budget.  Validating your encumbrances ensure you know where you are in terms of plus or minus at any given time in the budgetary year.  Waiting too long to find this position can be problematic.  When referring to our cash position and budgetary strategies, I always say, "We are here by design... not accident!"  If your not planning, reviewing and working with your administrators in developing and monitoring your budgets, it will lead to a crash.  


[1] The DOE use of DFG data to analyze the relationship between student achievement and the socioeconomic status of the communities in which they reside.
 

Thursday, October 16, 2014

Healthy Hunger Free Act - Taking a Bite out of School Lunch Programs


HHFKA 2010
Implementation of the new phase of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act has had a tremendous impact on food service operations throughout New Jersey and the rest of the country.  While the measures are geared at improving childhood nutrition the guidelines pose serious impediments to the overall health of the program forcing many districts to contemplate leaving the Federal School Lunch program due to the sharp decline in participation.


Elementary school children eating in a cafeteriaAt a recent presentation given at the Union County Association of School Business Officials (UCASBO)  meeting, a Food Service Management Company spokesperson state the prohibited items covered under the act that could no longer be vended contributed, on average, 200% of the surplus generated by any cafeteria.  Those item included such staples as Snapple, fresh baked cookies, pretzels and bagels.

Why are districts like our reluctant to leave the National School Lunch Program.  Like Summit many districts receive substantial funding from Federal and State reimbursement for their participation in the program.  For Summit that amount is approximately $300,000 per year.  That is over 20% of the cafeteria’s revenue.  $246,000 of that amount was to subsidize the meals for free and reduced-price students.


Like many districts across the country, we are working on assessing the impact on September sales, as well as watching trends to see if student acceptance increases.  So far, the results have had a devastating impact on the sale of certain food items, such as pizza and deli sandwiches, as well as a significant impact on a la carte sales.  Most importantly, a al carte sales enable many districts to offset increased costs of wholesome meals thus allow the district to maintain lower prices for those meals.    Furthermore, the decision to stay or go from the National School Lunch Program in New Jersey is dictated by NJ Administrative Code 2:36-1.6.  This code requires a district with more than 5% needy to adhere to the USDA guidelines for designing a meal. 


Of recent, the National School Boards Association released a statement of support of reconsideration of the rules by the USDA.


National School Boards Association Issues Press Release Calling for Flexibility with Regard to School Meals
The National School Boards Association has issued a press release calling for flexibility and relief from the U.S. Congress and USDA to address the unintended consequences of onerous requirements for federal school meal programs in the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.