Monday, December 17, 2012

BASIC SCHOOL SECURITY PROTOCOLS

In the wake of the recent tragedy experienced in Newtown, CT involving another school shooting, I am posting some basic security protocols that should be in place for all schools.  Unfortunately, these and other measures such as perimeter checks and risk assessments of our buildings and grounds will not eliminate the potential for this unspeakable violence; however, they can and have worked to prevent, deter or minimize the loss of life.

SECURITY PROTOCOLS

1.   NEED TO KNOW BASIS:  If parents or public ask you questions about our safety policies and procedures, please do not get specific. Specifics about safety procedures only need to be known by students and staff.  Please do generally communicate that we do have safety procedures in place, and that we take safety and security very seriously.
 
2.   CHALLENGE All Persons or groups within the building and redirect to the main office if unaccompanied or without an official visitors pass.

3.   ACCURATE ATTENDANCE EVERY SINGLE DAY.  Accurate attendance is one of the most important things you do each day. It is essential.

4.   REVIEW SAFETY PROCEDURES:  It is your responsibility to continuously review safety procedures.  Lock downs, fire drills, and evacuation procedures are something we all need to know backwards and forwards. 

5.   CLASS ROSTERS:  Always bring class rosters with you during ALL evacuation drills and take attendance. 

6.   TAKE DRILLS SERIOUSLY!  When we do drills, take them seriously and do all you can to get the students to do so as well.  There should be NO talking or sounds coming from classrooms during lockdown drills.

7.   NEVER prop exterior doors open, or let someone come in through a non-main-entrance door, unless they are first responders or accompanied by a staff member.

8.   IF YOU SEE SOMETHING…SAY SOMETHING:  REPORT violations of safety protocols, emergencies, and anything suspicious to the building Principal.

Sunday, December 16, 2012

Longevity's Time has Expired

Nothing drives me crazier than dealing with longevity in labor agreements!  Many collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) in the public sector both municipal and educational, have employees that receive contracted adjustment increases each year based on a flat amount or percentage of their salary.

While longevity made sense in its day as a method of acknowledging years of service and more importantly serving to entice the employee to stay in lower paid public sector jobs vs. leaving for a more lucrative opportunity in the private sector; its rationale is gone.

In the words of Gene Raskin who put English lyrics to the Russian romance song "Dorogoi dlinnoyu," "Those Were the Days" ... "we though they'd never end," ... apparently they didn't!

Data based on research surveys from the
International Association of Administrative Professionals
 (IAAP) and/or other sources as noted
1975
Average Salaries (National Secretaries Association membership survey)
$9,000-$11,000 32%
$11,000-$13,000 17%
$13,000-$15,000 7%
$15,000 and over 4%
60% reported salaries of $9,000 or more.


The worst part of this lopsided initiative is the fact that at inception the percentage method agreed to by governing bodies seemed harmless as the salaries of the day were ranging from the low to mid teens in the 70's and administrative salaries were closer to forties.  Therefore, even at 5% the yield could range from $450 - $750.  Not very alarming on a salary of $11,000 that received a total adjustment after say a 3% raise to $11,897.

Compared to today, that secretary is closer to $60,000 and probably looking at a 2% raise with the same 5% longevity costing $3,000 bringing the total salary to $64,200. 

The real issue is ...given the state of the economy in the private sector with salary freezes, downsizing and cuts/elimination of benefits, these employees are not going anywhere.  Longevity has been stopped in many contracts by grandfathering existing staff; however, given the fiscal constraints of tighter budgets one must consider the need repeal and abolish the practice, especially the percentages as the dollars sky rocket as the base has more than doubled or even tripled since the practice began.  In some cases you can have a six figure salary receiving a 5% or more longevity stipend which yields an instant $5,000 increase before even considering a raise.

Saturday, December 15, 2012

NJASBO School Development Authority Committee Work


NJ School Development Authority
Trenton Office
Over the past eight years I have been planning and managing facility projects through state facility grants.  The reimbursement process for all section 15 grant agreements going back as far as 2004 and carrying through into the current RODs (Regular Operating District's)Grants established in late 2008 2009 have proven to be an effective way to address critical facility needs at a significant savings of forty cents on the dollar or 40% from the state through direct reimbursement of final eligible costs (FEC) as determined by the NJDOE Office of Facilities. 
 
While impressive and vital to the continuation of these projects, the reimbursement process is best described as arduous requiring a paper chase of duplicative and labor intensive clerical work that often delays the actual receipt of the much needed funding.
 
With reimbursable grants, districts and or municipalities in Type I districts typically bond only the "local share" or 60% of the final approved project and issue short term notes for the "state share."  In reality, since reimbursement is only made after major milestones of project completion, this could roll into years as a typical project can span two or more fiscal school years as construction must be planned around the school day.
 
Recognizing and experiencing this fact with many of my colleagues the discussion became a focus area at our NJASBO (Association of School Business Officials) state meetings leading to the formulation of the SDA Committee with me as chair at the suggestion of  John Donahue, Executive Director NJASBO.
 
Over the past four months we have met with Marc D. Larkins, CEO; Jason E. Ballard, Chief of Staff; and Andrew D. Yosha, Vice President Chief of Operations.

The committee’s goals are as follows:


1.    Streamline the approval process to effectuate prompt payment to districts for RODS grants

2.    Simplify the process by converting PDF documents to Word and or Excel

3.    Improve communications between the SDA project specialists and district representatives throughout the process

4.    Address the need for information sharing between the NJDOE Office of Facilities and the NJSDA in an attempt to eliminate duplicative requests for information from districts on approved projects.

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Concerns about Outsourcing Payroll

"XXXXXX XXXXXXX" <x@xxxxschools.org> writes:
Does anybody outsource their payroll?
Outsourcing leads to loss of control and direct oversight
 
I recently got an email from a colleague asking about outsourcing payroll.  In these tough economic times with a 2% CAP on tax levy increases in New Jersey for public schools, many boards and administrators continue to search for savings that often lead to questions about outsourcing various functions of the operation.  Payroll is no exception as the there are a myriad of companies out there willing to take on the function at a savings to the client.  As with this or any outsourced function, keep in mind “business is business” and nothing is free.  Often I speak of “opportunity cost” in addition to actual dollars expended as the decision impacts your ability to retain direct control over the activity.  With payroll, having the ability to meet, discuss and review critical issues in real time vs. coordinating phone calls and follow up with individuals who are not familiar with the personnel or circumstances puts you at a loss.  Likewise, you lose the ability to brainstorm and create back up spreadsheets and calculations needed in negotiations, budgeting and on site verification of tax issues or employee deductions.   
  
Outsourcing payroll is really not a great option since you still are required to compile, calculate and prepare the payroll input prior to handing off to an outsourced company such as ADP.  The processing, printing and distribution is actually the easy part.
 
Not to mention the loss of control with respect to errors, compliance and proper remittance of taxes, look what happened a few years ago when municipalities and boards of ed got burned through an embezzlement of agency funds that were earmarked for tax remittance. 
 
“Even though you forward the tax payments to the third party to make the tax deposits, you—the employer—are the responsible party,” the IRS cautioned. “If the third party fails to make the federal tax payments, the IRS may assess penalties and interest. The employer is liable for all taxes, penalties and interest due. The IRS can also hold you personally liable for certain unpaid federal taxes.” (SEE BELOW)
  
http://www.accountingtoday.com
 
IRS Warns Employers about Payroll Outsourcing Fraud
 
Washington, D.C. (September 2, 2011)
By Michael Cohn, Accounting Today
 
The Internal Revenue Service issued advice on Friday to employers who outsource their payroll duties to third-party service providers.
 
In a tax tips email, the IRS referred to recent prosecutions of individuals and companies that pretended to be payroll service providers and instead stole funds intended for payment of employment taxes. The IRS noted that the employer is ultimately responsible for depositing and paying federal tax liabilities.
 
“Even though you forward the tax payments to the third party to make the tax deposits, you—the employer—are the responsible party,” the IRS cautioned. “If the third party fails to make the federal tax payments, the IRS may assess penalties and interest. The employer is liable for all taxes, penalties and interest due. The IRS can also hold you personally liable for certain unpaid federal taxes.”

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Preparing NJ Schools for Hurrican Sandy



Preparation for any major storm event is key in preventing injuries, fatalaties and protection against property damage.  This step is critical in mitigation process as the steps minimize overall damage and allow better management in dealing with the event.
 
Brayton ES sandbagging prep. 
Custodial/Maintenance personnel are key in protecting district assets both in preparation as well as managing the crisis and equally important, dealing with the recovery.
 
Following the storm:
Assess ALL damage and report it to your Risk Management Consultant AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

STORM ALERT: How to Prepare for Hurricane Sandy & Report Power Outages
How to Report Power Outages and Downed Power Lines
In preparation for Hurricane Sandy, expected to hit New Jersey early next week, local utility companies have provided information on how customers can stay safe and report power disruptions and downed power lines.

PSE&G Customers:
To report downed wires or power outages, customers should call PSE&G’s Customer Service line at 1-800-436-PSEG. PSE&G uses an automated system to handle customer calls as efficiently as possible. Customers who get an automated response when calling PSE&G are encouraged to use it, as it is designed to route their calls to the right destination quickly. The system also provides the option to speak directly to a customer service representative. If you have specific information regarding damage to wires, transformers or poles, we ask that you speak with a representative to provide that information.
Customers with a handheld device, or who are at an alternate location with power, can also report power outages and view the status of their outage by logging in to My Account at pseg.com. General outage activity throughout our service territory is available online at www.pseg.com/outagecenter and updates are posted on pseg.com during severe weather.
In addition, if outages are widespread, the utility will activate its Twitter page to keep the public informed about our restoration progress. Sign up as a follower at http://twitter.com/psegdelivers to monitor restoration progress.

JCP&L Customers:
To report an outage, please dial: 1-888 LIGHTSS (544-4877).
For updated information on the company’s storm preparation efforts, current outages, storm restoration process and tips for staying safe, visit the 24/7PowerCenter at www.firstenergycorp.com/outages_help.
Updates from JCP&L will also be available on Twitter at http://twitter.com/JCP_L.

Friday, October 26, 2012

A Return to Atlantic City for Major Ed. Confrences

NJEA Convention returns to A.C.

A focus on student equality and teacher quality

Published on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Equal educational opportunity and high quality teacher evaluation will be front and center at the 158th annual NJEA Convention November  8-9 in Atlantic City
This is the latest in a line of effective major educational conferences in New Jersey education to return to AC.  This is big for Education and even bigger for New Jersey as the conferences generate substantial revenue at the local and regional level; however, much of Atlantic City revenue is redistributed throughout the state in the form of state revenues that are counted on for balancing the annual budget.
WorkshopMany state associations affiliated with education conduct annual workshops and meetings over a three day conference in the city that was equipped for such events such as the Association of School Business Administrators (NJASBO) and the Association of School Administrators (NJASA) along with other groups bringing major dollars into the economy.  New Jersey School Boards Association for example generates over $7 million dollars of revenue for the city and region each year during their October conference; however, revenue is not the driving force behind the meetings which are designed to provide enhanced learning opportunities through a plethora of action labs, communication forums, small group discussions and a floor show featuring a wide array of services and products specifically designed for schools and school leaders to better assist in the deliver of instruction in a cost effective manner that addresses student performance and fiscal responsibility to the tax payer.
Chapter 78 better known as the Accountability Regulation or Travel Regs severely dampened this time honored tradition of summoning or convening of an assembly for a common purpose of improving education in the State of New Jersey. 
At the heart of the over restrictive regulations is the fact that educational conferences were capped at two night stays as opposed to the customary three nights that allowed for travel prior to the first full day of workshop.  Additionally, the law restricted overnight stays to greater than 50 miles from the conference; therefore, effectively diminishing the participation of many districts due to the inability to fully enjoy the conference as travel each day is not realistic and often places the member with choices of specific selection in the participation of a major learning opportunity.
Let's face it, we always need to ensure there is integrity, financial oversight and clear accountability in all public activities; however, is it any less important in other branches of industry or the public sector such as the League of Municipalities which I am also a member and participate in the learning and networking opportunities each year in Atlantic City without such burdensome regulations.
A full scale return to Atlantic City for all major conferences not only makes sense from the perspective of learning, sharing and networking; it allows delegates and members of all associations formulate platforms, goals and professional development opportunities while at the same time providing much revenue that creates and sustains jobs!    
 

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Charter Schools Continue to Pull Dollars from Regular Education

New N.H. law may cost Seacoast school districts hundreds of thousands | SeacoastOnline.com

NEWMARKET — Director of Pupil Services Jean Parsons warned the School Board on Thursday night that a new state law could cost the district hundreds of thousands of dollars each year.
The law, SB 300, changes the state's charter school statute and requires a student's resident district to pay to transport special education students when their parents send them to charter schools outside their home district, Parsons said Thursday night.
 
This is already the law in NJ!  SUBCHAPTER 3. CHARTER SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION
Transporation Photos
6A:27-3.1 General provisions
 
(a) Transportation or aid in lieu of transportation shall be provided to charter school students pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:39-1 et seq. A charter school shall be considered a public school offering a specialized program.

(b) The transportation of students to and from a charter school shall be the responsibility of the district board of education of the school district in which each student resides. Students who reside less than remote from their charter school are eligible for transportation in accordance with the policies of the district board of education in which they reside.
Before the law went into effect Aug. 10 in New Hampshire, the district in which the charter school was located had to pay to transport students, as long as they were subjects of individual education plans, Parsons said.
 
After attending a workshop yesterday sponsored by New Jersey Association of School Business Officials (NJASBO), representatives from the NJDOE Office of Transportation made it clear that the finacial burden to transport any student attending a Charter School resides with the Public School of Residence, i.e. the taxpayer.  Furthermore, it remains the districts reponsibility to attempt to bid the route or pay aid in lieu (AIL) at the established rate of $884.00 for the 2012-13 school year.
 
The transport must be in accordance with the Charter's school calendar and carrys with it all the rights granted to public education students:
 
6A:27-3.2 Eligibility requirements
(a) Students in kindergarten through grade eight and preschool students who meet the eligibility requirements defined in N.J.A.C. 6A:27-1.2(a) who reside more than two miles and students in grades nine through 12 who reside more than two and one-half miles from the charter school that they attend are eligible for transportation services.

(b) Special education students attending a charter school shall be eligible for transportation services if they meet the distance requirements of (a) above, or transportation is required in the student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP).
(c) The charter school shall be located within the State.

Many of the same requirements and provisions are in code for tranportation of students attending School Choice programs as well:

SUBCHAPTER 4. SCHOOL CHOICE TRANSPORTATION
6A:27-4.1 General provisions
(a) Transportation or aid in lieu of transportation shall be provided pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:39-1 et seq. A choice school shall be considered a public school offering a specialized program.

(b) The transportation of students to and from a choice school shall be the responsibility of the district board of education of the school district in which each student resides.